I'd like to open a discussion about credits, specifically related to film editing. Should a film that has been heavily re-cut be credited to the original editor or to the re-editor, or both? I only suggest this discussion should open since film historians are apt to connect to IMDB for their information, much of which could be incorrect. There are many cases in which films have been re-cut by other (uncredited) editors. I have been a film 'doctor' and there must be hundreds of films that have been heavily re-edited by uncredited editors. This also may apply to other grades.
Access
Group avatar
Members (237)
Recent posts
Recent comments
- Chyna_Doll on: Bruno - Official Movie Trailer
- SeasideMan pro on: Bruno - Official Movie Trailer
- jenray pro on: Bruno - Official Movie Trailer
- rolandbastien on: Iron Sky (movie teaser)
- wexeq on: Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus
- wexeq on: Just seen this...
- soyunperdedor pro on: Drag Me To Hell
- IgorAkineev on: Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus
- IgorAkineev on: Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus
- monica47000 on: The Lives of Others
- Show more
Search
Archives
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (4)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (6)
- January 2009 (6)
- December 2008 (7)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (13)
- July 2008 (15)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (10)
- April 2008 (7)
- March 2008 (18)
- February 2008 (20)
- more...
Calendar
Subscribe by email
You can receive the posts of this weblog by email.
editing credits
Trackback address for this post:
Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments
The re-editor should be acknowledged, but I would say that the credit should stay with the original editor. After all, they did the bulk of the work and re-editors tend to just move around scenes rather than the individual shots that make up those scenes, which were put in place by the original editor.
If huge amounts of new material was added, then perhaps a co-credit would be appropriate.
Tom.
| jimmycl [Member] 04/08/08 @ 12:01 |
Whilst not totally disagreeing with SeasideMan, in my experience re-editors do much more than "simply move around scenes" and I have changed films utterly, giving them new structures, new music etc...in my view this should be credited as "additional editing". As I said previously, I am more interested in keeping the record straight for future film historians.
| IronicFilmReference [Member] 05/08/08 @ 09:24 |
i think it depends on each film and the circumstances. If a re-edit merely touches the film up a bit, then there's little need for drawing attention to it but if it's significantly different in tone, like say The Magnificent Ambersons or Touch Of Evil or more recently the Redux cut of Apocalypse Now i think the editors should get their due for the hard work they have to put in. Too often the director seems to steal the limelight from the cutting room.
I was not talking about 'touching up the film a bit' - I was really referring to wholesale re-cutting of the material, such as Walter Murch did on both Touch of Evil and Apocalypse Now Redux, and was properly credited on those films. I'm really referring to films that have been heavily re-edited by others who don't get a credit. It is no secret that I recut Robert Benton's TWILIGHT from start to finish whilst Carol Littleton's name is up there as Editor. I don't personally care, but I'm concerned that future film historians could be misled (not about TWILIGHT since it was a flop and quickly forgotten!).
| IronicFilmReference [Member] 05/08/08 @ 10:53 |
of course it's not just editors who get a hard deal, do you believe all the writing credits you see? The person who wrote most of the script often gets only a small mention in the final credits.
I quite agree with you - writers also get a raw deal - perhaps the WGA should enter this discussion?
Leave a comment :
Recent Posts
-
Bruno - Official Movie Trailer
on Friday, Jul. 03, 2009 -
Iron Sky (movie teaser)
on Sunday, Jun. 28, 2009 -
The Manliest Film Ever?
on Thursday, Jun. 25, 2009 -
Drag Me To Hell
on Wednesday, Jun. 24, 2009 -
Fancy going to a Premiere?
on Wednesday, Jun. 10, 2009 -
The Lives of Others
on Monday, May. 18, 2009 -
Just seen this...
on Saturday, May. 16, 2009 -
The City of Lost Children (1995)
on Thursday, May. 14, 2009 -
Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus
on Wednesday, May. 13, 2009 -
DEMISE OF BRITISH SITCOM
on Friday, May. 08, 2009















04/08/08 @ 10:30